While faithful lay Catholics sit in shock at the abuse and misuse of sexual words and sexual actions by the bishops and some priests, the hierarchy makes in increasingly clear that they have only empty bromides to hurl at the LGBT community. There is no real theological engagement on the issues of sexual diversity, nor even on the subject of developing a coherent political theology. The hierarch's side of the debate consists of statements that are assumed but not argued, couched in inflated hyperbole that is designed to inflame. Can anyone name one straight marriage in the six states that permit gay marriage that has been harmed by allowing gays and lesbians to marry? I sincerely doubt it. Can anyone name any gay and lesbian couples who have been harmed by being unable to marry legally in their home states? Yes, there are many. Couples are denied tax and inheritance and joint property and social security and health insurance benefits under the law. Children's lives are less secure socially and economically because the two loving adults who are raising them cannot legally marry. These are real people, who are really hurting.
For legislators, they must answer a question that is not, fundamentally, a theological issue. It is a political issue. The legislatures are not deciding on Church marriage rules, which have always varied from civil marriage law. The legislatures are faced with one question, really. Are there two sets of laws that apply, one to couples of two genders, and another to the disadvantage of couples of the same gender, or are all consenting adult couples equal under the law?
For the hierarchy, they need to understand that if they act like politicians they will be treated with all the respect and deference the American people give to their politicians, which is to say, almost no respect and deference. Their task, which they have failed to accept, is to encourage theological discourse that will help develop an understanding about how the Holy Spirit is working in the lives of the faithful, in our times, and how the tradition of the Church can be informed by the signs of these our times. This must reflect the best of modern science, philosophy, and anthropology, as well as current scripture scholarship. Facile language about the resemblance of the NY State legislature to totalitarian regimes is inappropriate, and beneath the dignity of the episcopal office.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It is a pretty pathetic state of affairs... how small they make the Church, how small they make God.
It has always been about power and control for some and so it remains.
Tragic.
What is "tragic" is that within a few generations, embraced such a habit of sentimentalism, which makes us feel so good about ourselves: I know this gay couple, and I like them, and so I think they should be able to marry, and that makes me feel really good about me.
The problem is, Jesus was very clear on this point: marriage is about a man and woman leaving their families and becoming one flesh. That's fundamental, it's constant and I wonder if now, we're expected to believe that Jesus Christ, second person of the Trinity, Logos and Word, is just wrong about this. Is that what you believe? Thousands of years of understanding, in every culture, are suddenly to be declared wrong, because we want to feel good about ourselves. I have gay friends that I love, but I cannot get on board with gay marriage. Civil unions? Yes. Not gay marriage. I do not believe Jesus was "small" because he is truth, even when it is not convenient. I don't buy that because Jesus did not explicitly reject gay marriage, we can do whatever we want. That so many of us do think we can is what is truly tragic.
It is sad what the shepherds of this country are trying to do to members of their flock. They seem to be ignoring the people who are already struggling in marriages and trying to harm even more people. Marriage can be defended without all the hyperbole that is hurled at gays and lesbians. The bishops have let far more traditional marriages fail and suffer than they will ever protect by rejecting gay marriage.
In terms of Jesus and the views of marriage espoused to Him, it is hard to really define what is fundamental about what he said about marriage. Is it the sex of the people involved? Is it the leaving of the families? Is it the becoming one flesh? A lot of that happens with straight couples and we don't call it marriage. Also, a lot of that happens and there is no marriage--two people of the opposite sex could have left their families and could have a child together--does that mean they are married? There has to be more to it than that.
Post a Comment